Question: Is oral sex allowed in the Catholic Church?
February 28th, 2007 by
catholicwriter
This is the most popular post in my other blog, Catholic Writings, which today celebrates its first Gregorian birthday i.e. birthday according to the Gregorian calendar. Over the past 365 days, this post has seen 5,149 views, and has received many queries by Catholics and non-Catholics searching for answers, which I will try to provide here. Feel free to ask questions below and I will try my best to answer them.
First, what is the purpose of sex?
Some people say that sex is for the purpose of procreation. Unfortunately, such reasoning cannot justify sexual intercourse for women who have gone through menopause. Others say that sex is purely for pleasure, which is a hedonistic reason. Still others say that it is for bonding between husband and wife.
A more complete answer would be that it is for the renewal of marriage vows taken by a man and his wife at the altar. It is a renewal of the marital vows where both man and wife choose to freely give themselves totally to each other in an exclusive relationship that is open to life.
Sex is therefore a sign of love between a man and a woman. A love that is freely given to each other, complete and total, faithful to each other, and that is life-giving. This sexual act between man and woman is also a sign of God’s love for his church, and also a sign of God’s love as a trinity.
By this I mean the free, total, faithful and fruitful love between the Father and the Son. The Father willingly (read: free) gives himself completely (read: total) to the Son and only to the Son (read: faithful) because there is no one else that he can receive him in this total way, except for one that is like him. This is because only the Son is eternally begotten by the Father, as we recite in the Nicene Creed every Sunday Mass. And the Son too gives himself freely, completely, and faithfully to the Father. This love between them is so perfect that it yields (read: fruitful) the person of the Holy Spirit.
This Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life (as it is in the Nicene Creed as well) must be welcomed in any complete union, particularly the union between man and woman, husband and wife. In other words, any union between a man and a woman, particularly their sexual union, must be open to the Holy Spirit, the giver of life.
A sexual union that is not open to the Holy Spirit, the giver of life, is a union in which the couple says to God, “No, we don’t want you in our union.”
To answer the question on the Catholic teaching on oral sex, and in fact almost any question on sex, it is important to bear in mind these four conditions: FTFF - Free, Total, Faithful, Fruitful.
Is the sexual act in question Free, Total, Faithful, and Fruitful?
Is oral sex open to life? Can life come from oral sex? Is the Holy Spirit able to create life from oral sex?
The answer is ‘no’, because oral sex is not life-giving. This, however, refers to oral sex used as an ‘alternative’ to sexual intercourse. There are, however, two instances when oral stimulation of the genitals is allowed in a Catholic marriage.
The Catholic Church does not specify what is a complete act of sexual intercourse between a husband and his wife, but a good rule of thumb is that ejaculation should take place inside the woman’s vagina, and that both the husband and his wife have achieved sexual climax. The ideal act of conjugal love, according to Pope John Paul II’s “Love & Responsibility”, takes place when both the man and the woman climax at the same time.
In reality, this is hardly ever achieved. Karol Wojtyla (later Pope John Paul II), before his election to the papalship, explained that the man is usually the first to reach sexual climax, because of his biological nature. It is therefore the man’s responsibility to slow down, and help his wife to approach sexual climax, so that both can climax at the same time. This can be done through manual stimulation, which includes oral sex (without the ejaculation). This is the first case in which oral sex is allowed to be used in a Catholic marriage.
In the event that the man has already reached sexual climax, the act of sexual intercourse is not considered complete until the woman has also reached sexual climax. As such, the man is allowed to manually stimulate his wife to help her to reach sexual climax. This is the second case in which oral sex is allowed to be used in a Catholic marriage.
A note of caution: Care must be taken, however, to be aware of the line between love and lust. Love focuses on giving oneself to the other, while lust is about using another person for one’s own gratification. Husband and wife must always respect each other as persons to love, not as objects to be used for one’s own sexual or emotional gratification.
The original post (in a less complete form) is found in my other blog. Many queries were raised and answered there.
Posted in Marriage, Oral sex, Sex, Theology of the Body |
February 28th, 2007 at 5:41 pm
[...] I have made the first post by rewriting this blog’s most popular post and make it more complete here. [...]
March 7th, 2007 at 9:42 pm
Catholic Writer,
I’m writing to you after discussing this very topic in RCIA this evening; I am not myself in RCIA but sort of help out. The leader of my RCIA class is well learned in Theology of the Body and she essentially presented the Catholic position on the issue exactly as you did. I confess that I have not read Love & Responsibility though I’m quickly deciding I should.
I understand everything you’ve said but wonder if you think there might be any grey area here. Let me explain what I mean. I understand the criteria you present as necessary for the sexual act to be licit. Oral sex is not fruitful, check. Maybe this is a little like Bill Clinton asking the meaning of “is” but is there any wiggle room with the definition of “sexual act.” I think it’s a little too static of a phrase. What if over the course of an hour long lovemaking session, a couple began with oral sex (with ejaculation) and finished with vaginal sex. The vaginal aspect of the lovemaking session was open to life. Is it proper to view these as two distinct acts (the first being illicit and the second being licit) or could these two separate sexual acts (with all the foreplay before and after) be considered a single act. I think just anecdotally, that most people wouldn’t view them as two separate things but part and parcel of one total act. If a couple was asked what they did for that hour, it seems unlikely that their first reaction would be to begin to list the acts as separate events, but rather they might say, “We had sex.” Is this making sense at all? Thanks for your opinion.
March 8th, 2007 at 11:35 am
Hi RJackson,
That’s kind of a difficult question to answer, but thanks for bringing it up. I’ve got to say that I haven’t finished “Love & Responsibility” yet, because it is not an easy book to read. http://www.catholicculture.com has a PDF file with excerpts from the book. The website is, at present, under construction, but the file is still there. It’s the second link from the top.
Now about your question, perhaps in response to it another question is in order, and that is: Why would you want to have any other type of sex with your wife other than vaginal sex?
I’m not you, so I cannot answer for you. But I would have to ask myself, does ejaculating into the mouth of my spouse strengthen our marital bond? Am I respecting her dignity as a human person when I do this?
I believe that there is a proper place for the sperm to go to during sexual intercourse, and that place is where it can fulfil its purpose. It cannot fulfil its purpose in my wife’s mouth, so that’s not the proper place it should be.
That would be my answer to why ejaculation should always take place in the woman’s vagina during an act of sexual intercourse.
Hope that helps!
God bless,
Catholic Writer
March 24th, 2007 at 6:09 pm
I think you did a fine job answering this, and I agree with you. Sperm belongs in the woman’s vagina, not her mouth.
March 25th, 2007 at 10:33 am
Thanks happymama!
April 3rd, 2007 at 7:03 pm
I have a question. I have had fertility problems within the past few years. These past few months my problems have intensified with vaginal bleeding for long periods of time. My doctor prescribed a birth control pill to immediately stop the bleeding and regulate my cycle. My husband and I understand what the pill is and we have decided to abstain from intercourse during my treatment (which should be about 3 months, hopefully not more than that). My question is that my husband and I thought that it might be ok to be intimate using oral sex or other methods usually used only during foreplay to substitute during my treatment. Is this acceptable or are we in sin?
April 11th, 2007 at 4:44 pm
Hi mreveles,
Sorry for the late response.
It is great that you and your husband are abstaining from sex during the period of treatment. It shows great understanding and respect for the sanctity of sex.
There are other ways of being intimate that do not involve the use of sexual organs. Sexual organs should only be used for the purpose of sex in marriage.
Think back to the days when you and your husband were dating. Think of the various activities you used to do, the various intimate discussions you used to have, etc. There are many ways of being intimate that do not require the use of sexual organs. Embracing, kissing, holding hands, touching each other at other parts of the body are perfectly acceptable.
I will remember you in my prayers, and hope that you will recover from your problem soon.
God bless,
Catholic Writer